Publishing Ethic and Other policy
This page describes Apex Journal’s position on
the major ethical principles of academic
publishing and other publishing policy. We are
devoted to promoting the best ethical
publication practices across all its journals.
Openess
Source of funding
i. The source of funding for a research project
or the publication of an article should always
be clear.
ii. The source of the research funds should be
listed on all research papers. Authors should
acknowledge all significant funders of the
research pertaining to their article and list
all relevant competing interests.
iii. Funding for any type of publication, from
whatever source, private, government or
commercial, should be stated within the
publication. This applies to all types of papers
(including, for example, research papers, review
papers, letters, editorials, commentaries).
iv. Other sources of support for publications
should be clearly identified in the manuscript,
usually in an acknowledgement. For example,
these might include funding the article
processing charge for an open access article, or
funding for writing, language editing or
editorial assistance.
Authorship
i. The list of Authors should accurately reflect
who carried out the research and who wrote the
article.
ii. The list of Authors should correspond to the
following criteria; 1) substantial contributions
to conception and design, or acquisition of
data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2)
drafting the article or revising it critically
for important intellectual content; and 3) final
approval of the version to be published. Authors
should meet all three of these conditions.
iii. All Authors must meet these criteria for
authorship and conversely, no-one should be
omitted from the list if he/she meets these
criteria.
iv. We will try to resolve any disagreement of
authorship arising after publication if asked to
do so. We may consider publishing a correction
should this be deemed appropriate.
Dual Publication
i. Apex Journals only consider article
submissions which have not been published
previously. It is important to ensure that
research work is only published once. If it is
published more than once, the scientific
literature can be unjustifiably weighted by the
appearance that one study has been replicated.
It might also mean that the study is
inadvertently entered twice into a
meta-analysis, for example, or cause problems in
systems which use the number of publications to
assess an individual’s or an institute’s
research output.
ii. There may be situations (e.g. review
articles) where previously published work can be
included in summary form, but it must be made
clear to the Editor on submission that this is
the case. Publication of an abstract at a
meeting does not preclude later submission of
the full article to a Apex Journal. Submissions
containing material that has previously formed
part of a PhD or other academic thesis which has
been published according to the requirements of
the institution awarding the qualification can
also be considered.
iii. The submitted work and its essential
substance may not previously have been published
and may not be under consideration for
publication elsewhere..
iv. If a primary research report is published
and later found to be a duplicate (i.e. has been
published before), we will contact the Authors
and consider publishing a notice of redundant
publication.
Conflicts of interest
i. All Authors and Referees must declare any
conflicts of interest relating to a given
article.
iiConflicts of interest are defined as those
that, through their potential influence on
behaviour or content or from perception of such
potential influences, could undermine the
objectivity, integrity or perceived value of
publication.
ii.i We require the corresponding author to
provide the declaration of any conflicts of
interest on behalf of all the authors. All
relevant conflicts of interest must be included
in the article.
They may include:
a. Employment – recent, current and anticipated
by any organisation that may gain or lose
financially through publication
b. Sources of funding – research support by any
organisation that may gain or lose financially
through publication
c. Personal financial interests – stocks and
shares in companies that may gain or lose
financially through publication; consultation
fees or other forms of remuneration from
organisations that may gain or lose financially;
patents or patent applications whose value may
be affected by publication
d. Membership of relevant organisations.
iv. Referees are asked to declare their
conflicts of interest when returning their
report on a paper.
If a member of the editorial team feels a
conflict of interest in making a decision on a
paper, he/she should return the paper to the
office and request that it is transferred to an
alternative Editor.
Misconduct
Research misconduct includes fabrication,
falsification, or plagiarism in proposing,
performing, or reviewing research, or in
reporting research results.
a) Fabrication is making up data or results and
recording or reporting them
b) Falsification is manipulating research
materials, equipment, or processes, or changing
or omitting data or results such that the
research is not accurately represented in the
research record
c) Plagiarism is the appropriation of another
person's ideas, processes, results, or words
without giving appropriate credit
d) Research misconduct does not include honest
error or differences of opinion
If misconduct is suspected journal Editors will
act in accordance with the relevant COPE
guidelines: http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
In cases of suspected misconduct, we will
proceed as follows:
i. Referees will be asked to comment on any
evidence of scientific misconduct in papers they
review.
ii. If we encounter an accusation of plagiarism
or dual publication, a full investigation will
be undertaken.
iii. Should a full investigation verify
misconduct a response will be sought from the
Authors. If this is satisfactory and a mistake
or misunderstanding has taken place, the matter
can be resolved. If not, the following steps
will be taken;
i) The Editors of all the journals concerned
will act together and impose a ban on that
individual's publication in their journals for a
period, say three years.
ii) The Editors will also contact the Author's
head of department/employer and can choose to
contact the Author's funding body and inform
them of the misconduct revealed.
iii) In cases of published plagiarism or dual
publication, an announcement will be made in
both journals explaining the situation,
including 'retractions' if work is proven to be
fraudulent.
Editorial standards and processes
Peer-review systems
We do all we can to ensure the peer-review
process is fair and we aim to minimize bias.
i. All papers submitted to Apex Journal
International are peer-reviewed in a
single-blind fashion (Author names are not
concealed, but Referee names are).
ii. For submissions to the International
Research of Medical, the guest Editor of the
issue manages the review process and is
encouraged to seek at least two Referees for
each paper. Guest Editors produce a report on
the review process that each paper has
undergone.
iii. If discussions between an Author, Editor,
and Referee have taken place in confidence they
will remain in confidence unless explicit
consent has been given by all parties or there
are exceptional circumstances.
iv. Editors or board members are never involved
in editorial decisions about their own work and
in these cases papers may be referred to other
Editors or the Editor-in-chief.
Appeals
Authors have a right to appeal editorial
decisions.
i. The author should submit the grounds for
their appeal to the Editorial Office, addressed
to the Editor.
AUTHORS ARE DISCOURAGED FROM
DIRECTLY CONTACTING EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS AND
EDITORS WITH APPEALS.
ii. Following an appeal, all editorial decisions
are final.
iii. Editors will mediate all exchanges between
Authors and Referees during the peer-review
process (i.e. prior to publication). If
agreement cannot be reached, Editors may
consider inviting comments from additional
Referee(s) if appropriate.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence is respected. The content
of Apex Journal is entirely independent of the
organization’s views on any scientific or policy
issues. The Editor’s decision is final and will
not be influenced or compromised in any way.
Standards of Accuracy
We have a duty to publish corrections when
errors could affect the interpretation of data
or information. Correction is normally used when
a small portion of an otherwise reliable
publication proves to be misleading.
Journals will also publish ‘retractions‘
(notification of invalid results) if work is
proven to be fraudulent or as a result of a
significant but honest error, 'expressions of
concern' (notification where the validity of the
results are in doubt), ‘notices of redundant
publication‘ and addenda
A correction is created including its own unique
identification details
i. the original article's full citation details
(i.e. authors, title, journal, volume, issue,
and article identifier )
ii. the date of the issue that the article was
published in
iii. the correction details (including any
necessary figures and tables)
Retractions
Retractions will be published as a ‘notice of
retraction‘ and will reference the now retracted
article. The retraction will be published at the
bottom of the next available issue
The retraction will be published in a prominent
section of the journal.
i. The retraction will be listed in the contents
page, and include in its heading the title of
the article.
ii. The retraction must be signed by one of the
following: the author, the author's legal
counsel, the author's sponsoring institution, or
the editor of the journal.
iii. The text of the retraction will explain why
the article is being retracted.
Notices of redundant publication
Notices of redundant publication will be
published online and reference the duplicate
article. In addition, the notice will be
published at the end of the printed volume.
i. They will enable the reader to identify and
understand the correction in context with the
errors made, or should explain why the article
is being retracted, or should explain the
Editor's concerns about the contents of the
article.
ii. They will be linked electronically with the
original electronic publication, wherever
possible.
iii. They will be in a form that enables
indexing and abstracting services to identify
and link corrections and retractions.
Addenda
These are published works that provide
additional information or clarification to
another work. These should be peer reviewed.
Open criticism and debate
We encourage academic debate and constructive
criticism of the research published in our
journals.
We invite Authors to respond to any editorial
correspondence before publication. However,
Authors do not have a right to veto unfavorable
comments about their work and they may choose
not to respond to criticisms. Any appeals must
be dealt with accordingly
No referee comment or published correspondence
may contain a personal attack on any of the
Authors. Criticism of the work (not the
researcher) is encouraged and Editors should
edit (or reject) personal or offensive
statements.
Research ethics and animal treatment
i. Articles will be accepted only if they are
considered ethically sound in the judgement of
the Editor.
Intellectual Property
Plagiarism, copyright and intellectual
property
Plagiarism is the process of
copying another person's idea or written work
and claiming it as original. It includes both
the theft or misappropriation of intellectual
property and the substantial unattributed
textual copying of another's work. It does not
include authorship or credit disputes.
The theft or misappropriation of intellectual
property includes the unauthorized use of ideas
or unique methods obtained by a privileged
communication, such as a grant or manuscript
review.
All Authors are required to grant us an
exclusive publishing license before their work
can be published by send a short letter of
permit.
Referee conduct and intellectual property
i. Authors are entitled to expect that Referees
or other individuals privy to the work an Author
submits to a journal will not steal their
research ideas or plagiarize their work.
ii. We require all Referees to treat submitted
material in confidence until it has been
published.
iii. Any allegations of theft or plagiarism must
be substantiated and will be treated seriously.
iv. We strive to protect Referees from Authors
and, even if Referee identities are revealed,
will discourage Authors from contacting Referees
directly, especially if misconduct is suspected.
Content availability and open access
Apex Journal International is committed to the
widest possible dissemination of research
outputs. Consequently, our own publishing
operation is one of the most open access of all
science publishers. We offer the following types
of open and free access to our journal articles;
Through our open access option or authors may
have their article made freely available to all,
immediately upon publication, by payment of an
article processing charge. Such articles are
covered by a Creative Commons license allowing
redistribution and re-use.
Media embargo
The main findings of articles should not have
been reported in the mass media. Like many
journals, we employ a strict embargo policy
where the reporting of a scientific article by
the media is embargoed until a specific time.
The Editor has final authority in all matters
relating to publication.
Copyright
Apex Journal allows authors to retain copyright.
Instead, authors need to provide us with a
licence to publish. Open access articles are
published under a creative commons licence
(CC-BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/